← All posts

Gatebridge vs. YubiKeys: when hardware keys make sense

An honest comparison: physical security keys vs. a phone-backed bridge for remote Linux sign-in.

The most common objection to Gatebridge is: “Why not just buy a YubiKey?”

It’s a fair question. Physical security keys are excellent. They work offline, they’re trusted at enterprise scale, and they’re phishing-resistant. But they’re not always the right tool.

Where YubiKeys win

  • Offline sign-in. A YubiKey works with no network. Gatebridge needs your phone online and reachable through a relay.
  • Compliance. Many regulated environments require certified hardware tokens.
  • Shared workstations. A physical key can be handed to a contractor or used on a kiosk.
  • No phone dependency. If the phone is lost, dead, or out of battery, the key still works.

Where Gatebridge wins

  • Headless and remote Linux. You can’t plug a YubiKey into a server in a datacenter. USB forwarding is fragile. A phone-backed bridge works wherever the server has network access.
  • No per-seat hardware buying. A YubiKey costs $25 to $55 per person. That adds up at 50 seats. Gatebridge costs less than one key per year.
  • No extra hardware to manage. The phone is already in every employee’s pocket. No lost keys to reissue, no inventory to track.
  • Instant revocation. Lose a phone? Revoke it in the admin console. Lose a YubiKey? Order a replacement and re-enroll.

The honest answer

If your team needs offline sign-in or is in a compliance regime that requires physical tokens, buy YubiKeys.

If your team signs in to remote Linux servers and can’t justify per-seat hardware, or can’t physically plug in a key, Gatebridge is the pragmatic stronger-than-password option.

They’re not mutually exclusive. Many organizations use both: YubiKeys for laptops, Gatebridge for servers.

Get notified at launch

Gatebridge is not out yet. Leave your email and we will let you know the moment it ships. Early subscribers get a free period when we launch.